Q1. Do you agree with the author’s argument that behaviour in the classroom is reflective of how students will behave in the “real world”? Support your arguments with relevant theories or examples?
Q2. In your opinion, do you think it would be a good idea to have a model honor code similar to The University of Virgina (UVa)’s in USM or your college? Will the code work? Why or why not?
Q3. ‘Some quarters have linked the recent ethical debacles to business schools for not teaching business ethics appropriately’. Do you agree with this statement or does the fault lie with the students for not having a moral compass to start with? Support your arguments with the relevant theories/evidence you have studied/uncovered.
1 comment:
ANSWER QUESTION 1
i. - We agree with the argument author namely behavior in the classroom will reflect how students would behave deep real world.
ii. - Use theory deontological namely declared that an action is right / wrong not it caused by benefit to oneself or other people but caused one myself measure quality or rule which followed. Responsibility is theory deep about basic deontological because 'do unto others hope you would have them do unto you and because amount of respect to other.
iii. - For example much research stresses the importance kinship. These studies show that easier children bred at an early stage children hear about and see in action values, design often acquired by learning process.
ANSWER QUESTION 2
- To our opinion, we agree model honor code was the idea that work well if practice at college. This is because model honor code can detect plagiarism happens inside students with the way check back past data are. If someone the students found guilty with unlawful model honor code, students involve will be removed on from the college and would not be accepted more.
ANSWER QUESTION 3
- We agreed with the statement this is because decline problem ethic among student is due to not get ethics training appropriately. This ethic because of course business not offered in school stated. This matter as offence could not be put only to student merely. Supported this argument by using theory teleological namely accordance with majority reasoning moral and provide method clear and objective in decision making connected with the issue moral.
Post a Comment